sunrider liberation day how is research points earned?

When considering the infliction of pain upon a sentient being, it must be clarified that it is not the action which brings about pain that should be considered as equal, rather it should be the amount of pain felt by the receiver of pain. Pain and Equal Consideration of the Rights of Animals To those who do not agree with this statement, I implore you to put out a cigar on an infant or to cut off the leg of a handless mute, for they obviously feel no pain according to your requirement of an expression of language. For, as the philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein once stated, 'Language may be necessary for abstract thought, at some level anyway but states like pain are more primitive, and have nothing to do with language' (14).

This ability of expression is called language and it should not be considered a detriment to the principle of equality for all sentient beings.

It seems that the only difference is the ability to express pain in terms that we humans understand. The author of a book on pain which is quoted in Singer's Animal Liberation writes, 'Apart from the complexity of the cerebral cortex (which does not directly perceive pain) nervous systems are almost identical to and their reactions to pain remarkably similar.' (12). Although there may be some Descartians around who still believe that animals are strictly highly functioning automata, it is generally considered that animals can experience and receive pain. Language is Not a Prerequisite to Animal Rightsįinding that nonhuman beings can suffer due to an experience of pain is not a difficult thing to determine. In the article ' Animal Rights: Equal Experiencers of Suffering,' I argue that animals have an interest not to experience suffering. The beings which are affected are those which have interests. The groundwork for this argument is that if possessing intelligence of a higher degree does not entitle one human to use another for his or her own ends, how can it entitle humans to exploit nonhumans for the same purpose? Humans and Nonhumans Have Equal Interests Not to SufferĪs we have seen, the principle of equality is a principle which determines to take into equal consideration the interests of all beings affected by such a principle.

'Speciesism is a prejudice or attitude of bias in favor of the interests of members of one's own species and against those of members of other species' (6). Those who do not agree that nonhumans should be equally considered to humans are called speciesists. However, the true dilemma arises when considering the relationship of equality between humans and nonhumans. Those who agree to equality when considering race or sex are not uncommon.

Sunrider liberation day how is research points earned?